By Rick M 
After the disruption with the airlines over protests, Nepali airlines have restarted helicopter rescuing of the Everest region. The protests were carried out because of the possible damage that might have happened to the environment and the decline that it might have caused to local organizations. The helicopters are an essential part of the local community’s life, as they are the main means of transportation for climbers and local villagers without road access. In most cases, these flights are used to save climbers throughout the peak trekking season that happens every year.
Local people and the authorities who regulate aviation had to talk about the issue before the helicopters could run again. Local people were opposed to the increased usage of helicopters as it led to the loss of traditional trekking routes serving local businesses. Almost every year, thousands of trekkers explore the Everest region, and most are dependent on the income generated by these tourists for their livelihoods. The reliance on helicopters to provide quick access to the base camp is a way of making money that should not prevail over the traditional method of trekking, which has been the local’s mode of survival for a long time.
Mingma Gyalje Sherpa, who is very famous in the mountain tourism industry, has stated that the success of helicopter rescuing is directly linked to the guarantee of climbers’ safety. He said, “No choppers! No climbers!” for example, Jost Kobusch abandoned his expedition because he was afraid of the lack of help in case of emergency. This situation indicates a larger conflict between touristic developments and the need to keep local cultural and livelihood elements untouched.
While the search and rescue missions are on, the blockage has not lessened yet. Community representatives are currently in talks about striking a delicate balance between tourism and the local economic benefits. The government has to manage the tourism sector by finding a solution that includes both options. It is a thorough procedure that also includes debate on the green issues that the locals feel might be endangered with the increased air traffic in Sagarmatha National Park.
The issue has set off broader concerns about the future of trekking tourism in Nepal. Regardless of the fact that helicopters are crucial in situations of emergency, their use still allows us to ponder the issues of equality and sustainability in the same territories. At the end of these meetings, everyone is in the hope that they will be more successful and respect the rising needs of climbers as well as the claims of locals as well.
In another development, the government is also concentrating on strengthening rural infrastructure so that helicopters will not be the sole means of access. The whole purpose of this initiative is to give tourism balanced tractions with befitting conditions for all the involved stakeholders. It is the locals who have been calling for more roads to be built so that easier and safer access to the remote areas and, at the same time, secure the traditional trekking routes would be achieved.
The skies of Nepal are a battleground at the beginning of the trekking season, as the results of these negotiations will determine the satisfaction of both local communities and international climbers. The problem is that the level of government, the tour operators, and the residents have not been cooperating, thus increasing complexity. With more than fifty thousand visitors expected to pass through the Everest region this year, attaining common ground will be essential for all groups to utilize Nepal’s wonderful natural environment.