Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Tuesday, July 1
    Trending
    • Explore the Best Electric Scooters for Adults by Performance and Price
    • Nepal Wins Best Popularity Award at BITE 2025
    • MS Dhoni Gets Approval for ‘Captain Cool’ Trademark
    • Gold Loan Market Grows Rapidly Over Five Years
    • Shekhar Koirala Slams Changes to Civil Service Bill
    • Pros and Cons of the Maxshot V1 Electric Scooter
    • Mirmire Film Workshop Begins for Dayahang and Saput Movie
    • Ajay Joshi’s Journey from Photojournalist to Combat Sports Champion
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    Nepal MonitorNepal Monitor
    • Home
    • About
    • News
    • Kathmandu
    • Business
    • Entertainment
    • Travel
    • Culture
    • Sports
    Subscribe
    Nepal MonitorNepal Monitor
    Home » Supreme Court of Nepal Becomes Conservation Battleground
    News

    Supreme Court of Nepal Becomes Conservation Battleground

    nadminBy nadminSeptember 12, 2024No Comments3 Mins Read0 Views
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email WhatsApp Copy Link
    Follow Us
    Google News
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Copy Link

    Nepal’s Supreme Court has become the last line of defense for conservationists, who are struggling to save the country’s diverse flora and fauna as well as its natural heritage. This development comes at a time when most civil society organizations have kept quiet on critical conservation issues that might have lasting impacts on the country’s protected areas and endangered species.

    The court which has always been on the forefront in supporting environmental and biodiversity issues is now in the spotlight. It is hearing a case that may decide the future of protected areas of Nepal, which is a habitat of some of the most threatened species in the world. However, if the civil society is not supportive of the decision made by the court it may lead to criticism and the court being termed as ‘anti- development’.

    The situation came to an extreme in April when the government passed the law that allowed the private developers to construct the infrastructure in the protected zones – the zones that the indigenous people were removed or severely limited in their access. Nevertheless, civil society did not react to the law that could potentially reverse the achievements of the last several decades of conservation efforts of lawyers had to step in to defend the problem in court.

    This silence is in contrast to other public mobilizations in the recent past years. For example, in 2018, the government came up with changes on the guthi system concerning religious and cultural ownership of land and this sparked protests across the country and the government rescinded these changes without the need for the courts. Likewise, people’s protests stopped the construction of a swimming pool over a historic pond in Kathmandu.

    These new legal provisions now allow the commercialization of the protected areas like Chitwan and Sagarmatha national parks for private sectors in investment for hydropower, hotels, roads and railway etc. However, the said provisions have been put on hold by the Supreme Court for some time although the matter is still in court.

    According to the conservationists, this state of affair could have been prevented if civil society had intervened early enough. Under the guise of procedures to open protected areas for hydropower development, the Tanzanian government was gradually leading to an ordinance and since nobody stood against it, the government was encouraged to go further. Now the government is said to be in the process of formulating rules that would allow hotel establishments in protected areas as well as activities such as mountain biking and motorboating.

    As mentioned by the Supreme Court justices, one of the critical challenges that have been observed to exist is the lack of integration of ministries. Quite frequently, a ministry will set a policy or rule and fail to involve other parties, and it becomes the court’s role to settle the issues that arise from the policy or rule made.

    While Nepal continues to face these conservation challenges, the capacity of the Supreme Court in the promotion of sustainable development is more and more critical.

    But the absence of a strong civil society which the court can rely on in order to protect Nepal’s natural resources may be a challenge. The case is a good illustration of the fact that people should not be passive spectators when it comes to environmental issues and one has to be prepared for negative outcomes in case of inaction.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email WhatsApp Copy Link
    nadmin
    • Website

    Related Posts

    News

    Shekhar Koirala Slams Changes to Civil Service Bill

    July 1, 2025
    News

    Speaker Ghimire Urges Parties to Respect Parliament’s Dignity

    June 30, 2025
    News

    Mahesh Bartaula Urges Pokharel to Withdraw Nomination

    June 29, 2025
    News

    House of Representatives to Discuss Finance Bill Today

    June 28, 2025
    News

    Nepal Advances Digital Health System With Unified Data Plan

    June 27, 2025
    News

    Madhav Nepal Granted Bail in Land Misuse Case

    June 26, 2025
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Recent Posts
    • Explore the Best Electric Scooters for Adults by Performance and Price
    • Nepal Wins Best Popularity Award at BITE 2025
    • MS Dhoni Gets Approval for ‘Captain Cool’ Trademark
    • Gold Loan Market Grows Rapidly Over Five Years
    • Shekhar Koirala Slams Changes to Civil Service Bill
    • Pros and Cons of the Maxshot V1 Electric Scooter
    Categories
    • Blog
    • Business
    • Culture
    • Entertainment
    • Kathmandu
    • News
    • Others
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Travel
    © 2025 Nepal Monitor
    • Home
    • About
    • News
    • Kathmandu
    • Business
    • Entertainment
    • Travel
    • Culture
    • Sports

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.